wizofoz

kwmitch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don’t post much – only when I can’t resist.
> Let’s assume what this disgruntled journalist says
> is actually true. This “bummer” isn’t twofold at
> all. If employers will expect the designation,
> then those who do not have it are eliminated.
> That’s a strong case for having the charter.
> That’s a huge segment of the job candidate
> population (those without charters) that just went
> “poof”. Then we are supposed to believe that an
> increased number of charterholders is a bad thing
> for dilution? That’s contradictory – and it
> doesn’t take a genius to see it.
>
> I'm not making any claims in the above, I'm just
> drawing a conclusion based the journalist's own
> words. Again, this assumes what the journalist
> says is true – but don’t count on it.

Well said. Lot of people in IT and backoffice are working towards CFA even though many of them may not directly work in PM or front office. That means even for IT or backoffice job search, having any level of CFA experience is a plus.