busterbluth

I don’t post much – only when I can’t resist. Let’s assume what this disgruntled journalist says is actually true. This “bummer” isn’t twofold at all. If employers will expect the designation, then those who do not have it are eliminated. That’s a strong case for having the charter. That’s a huge segment of the job candidate population (those without charters) that just went “poof”. Then we are supposed to believe that an increased number of charterholders is a bad thing for dilution? That’s contradictory – and it doesn’t take a genius to see it.

I'm not making any claims in the above, I'm just drawing a conclusion based the journalist's own words. Again, this assumes what the journalist says is true – but don’t count on it.