
- UID
- 223442
- 帖子
- 402
- 主题
- 11
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
gjertsen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Millview Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I read through the CFAI stuff as well, but to
> be
> > honest, it is not the most tightly written
> > material on the planet. I think you should read
> > the CFAI stuff just to know what providers like
> > Kaplan and Stalla are skipping. I just wondered
> > what the Stalla Q bank is like and the practice
> > exams too.
>
> I'm mystified when I see comments that imply that
> a test provider has left out testable material. ICc
> used Schweser for 3 levels, and can honestly say
> that not a single question struck me as something
> I wasn't taught in the Schweser curriculum. I'm
> not saying I *retained* everything and never had
> to guess at a question, but that's my fault not
> Schweser's.
>
> That said, I would be tempted to try Stalla next
> time, just because I made it through so much of
> Schweser's QBank. Also Stalla's policy for
> retakers who were with Stalla the first time is
> superior to Schweser's discount.
L2 last year had one question I know with 100% certainty that Schweser called a formula something different than what cfai called it, and Schweser kids all missed it if they hadn't seem it in cfai text.
You're kidding yourself if you think Schweser can condense every possible point of the cfai text. Do they probably do 90-95%? Absolutely. Have there been questions on that 5-10%? absolutely.
_____________________________________________________
-My friend QQQbbe, we will never forget you. |
|