tikfed

A also for #1, not sure about #2
I think the issue with #1 is your definition of the word “conflicts”. Just b/c your following a more-strict standard doesn’t mean you’re conflicting with a law. for the example you mentioned: less-strict law so more-strict standard is followed. This means to me that members would be going above and beyond the law, not conflicting with it. In other words, you’re covering yourself by following the less-strict law and IN ADDITION adding another layer of protection by adhering to the more-strict standard.
I understood choice A to mean that standard must always be followed instead of laws, which is not the case and therefore the correct “incorrect” answer.
hope that helps - at least I think it’s correct, maybe its all hogwash. anyone else get this question correct? Is it in fact A?