| 
 
   
- UID
 - 223379 
 - 帖子
 - 277 
 - 主题
 - 70 
 - 注册时间
 - 2011-7-11 
 - 最后登录
 - 2016-4-19 
 
  | 
3#
 
 
发表于 2011-9-19 21:00
 |  只看该作者
 
 
 
STL23,  
 
I felt the EXACT same way you did, actually received results similar to yours (I took the test in Atlanta). After nonstop studying, passing three practice exams with +70%, and feeling confident after the test, when I got my results, I was not only surprised that I failed, but was completely taken away by how much I failed. Seven out of my ten categories were in the <50% range, and the remaining three were between 50-70%, with NONE in the above 70% range. I was Band 4. Only last december, when I passed Level 1, I had 7/10 categories in the >70% range, three in the 50-70% range, and none below 50%. So I pretty much did the exact opposite.  
 
Has the CFA ever made mistakes when it comes to scoring the scantrons? I hear that retabulations are a crock, but I also strongly feel that there might be a mistake. Its almost like half of my test wasn't graded correctly, because I find it hard to believe that I didn't earn >70% in any of the sections, especially given my performance during the practice exams and my knowledge/level of confidence of the material. I almost feel like I could have saved 5 months of my life and skipped studying all together, and still have gotten the same results.  
 
Would a retabulation in my case make more sense than somebody who barely failed? I hate grasping at thin air, and would much rather put it behind me, but has anybody come across the CFA screwing up the scoring and having the fail turn into a pass?  
 
Thanks |   
 
 
 
 |