|
- UID
- 222289
- 帖子
- 395
- 主题
- 7
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-2
- 最后登录
- 2016-8-30
|
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:41
| 只看该作者
Ashwin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't think so. The continuous compounding one
> uses function "e" in the calculator. It is assumed
> to be compounding lot more frequently than the
> constant rate and as a result gives you more in
> result than the constant rate.
That is what I thought. Finquiz used the term constant interest rate and then calculated it as e. |
|
