ppls

Summit - ROS says disclose if you are owning stock or have an interest in stock you are recommending - that was violated.

do not see an issue with Overland. The disclosure in writing of reimbursement was made to the employer - so looks fine...

language wise - this is vastly cut and dry with respect to the twists the institute does throw at us though! Looks like I need a translator on exam day for the ethics portion, definitely...

CP

zephyranalyst

The first is a definite violation, no point commenting.

To add to what CP said- The key word is client, as 'gifts' from them are usually given a bit more leeway. As long as you communicate it to your employer, and it doesn't affect your objectivity with other clients, it's usually fine.

5566

Haha, what's funny is I interpreted the 2nd situation as if the client was a target of research. I believe it would be a violation if a research target was involved, but it is fine in this case.

NO EXCUSES