Kapie

I agree show NY, I was looking over the errata last week. Some of the changes are pretty drastic. I dont understand how they can release a text with so many errors in it.... I am glad that I only used Schweser to supplement the CFAI texts....

Starting to stress......

lucasg85

schweser has a massive amount of errata in their text this year that i just noticed yesterday. really unnaceptable i think.

hassan

I used CFAI books, did all EOCqs twice, I did all Schweser practice exams, did their online mock AM part, did both CFA sample exams, will do CFA mock early next week

I used CFAI books last year for L1 too, I am used to those, I highlight whats important and it helps me when reviewing, I dont make any own notes.

Practice exams are ok, sometimes questions or answers are wrong or stupid but it does not happen too often. You can see my results in "Schweser Mock discussion" thread.

For example: I remember one question in ethics; you find an arbitrage opportunity (it was something like FX forward arbitrage) and answer says that it is OK to tell client that it is risk-free opportunity to earn money. This is not true, because it can be risk-free from market risk point of view, but not from other (credit) risks point of view...

Uranus08

...does the lack of traffic on this post indicate those who use CFAI text only are in the minority?

I think so, you need a "bit" of everything to be really sure you will beat this beast come June 5/6.


I used CFAI text + Schweser videos and Practice exams + Stalla videos and Passmaster.