- UID
- 223326
- 帖子
- 348
- 主题
- 123
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-23
|
42#
发表于 2012-3-29 15:48
| 只看该作者
Hise Home Supply is a large, profitable home improvement retailer located in the United Kingdom. Hise has recently been acquiring niche retailers with popular brand names in certain segments of the home improvement market. One of these retailers was Wilson Tile and Stone, a U.S. business that derived a large part of its sales from the UK. The management team for Hise now makes all operating, financing, and investment decisions. Brian Heltzel, a financial analyst for Hise, is responsible for translating Wilson’s financial statements from U.S. dollars to the reporting currency. Hise conducts its business and issues financial statements in British pounds (£).Wilson Tile and Stone – December 31, 2007 and 2008 Balance Sheets |
|
|
| | | |
| 2007 | 2008 |
Cash | $1,200 | $1,400 |
Accounts receivable | 6,500 | 9,900 |
Inventory | 10,400 | 12,400 |
Current assets | $18,100 | $23,700 |
Fixed assets | 40,000 | 40,000 |
Accumulated depreciation | 10,000 | 15,000 |
Net fixed assets | $30,000 | $25,000 | | | |
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $48,100 | $48,700 | | | |
|
|
|
Accounts payable | $5,000 | $6,000 |
Current portion of LT debt | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Long term debt | 25,000 | 23,500 |
Total liabilities | $31,500 | $31,000 |
Common stock | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Retained earnings | 6,600 | 7,700 |
Total equity | $16,600 | $17,700 | | | |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES and EQUITY | $48,100 | $48,700 |
Wilson Tile and Stone – 2008 Income Statement | | |
|
|
Revenue |
$75,000 |
Cost of goods sold |
(60,000) |
Gross margin |
$15,000 |
Other expenses |
(2,300) |
Depreciation expense |
(5,000) |
Net Income |
$7,700 |
Wilson uses the FIFO method for inventory accounting.
Applicable exchange rates are as follows: - December 31, 2007: £1.00 = $1.60
- December 31, 2008: £1.00 = $1.80
- Average for 2008 = £1.00 = $1.70
- Historical rate for fixed assets, inventory, and equity: £1.00 = $1.50
Which of the following statements regarding foreign currency translation methods is most accurate? A)
| The British pound is the reporting currency and Heltzel should use the current rate method. |
| B)
| The British pound is the functional currency and Heltzel should use the temporal method. |
| C)
| The U.S. dollar is the functional currency and Heltzel should use the current rate method. |
|
The basis for using the current rate method is when Functional Currency is NOT the same as Parent's Presentation (reporting) Currency. The basis for using the temporal method is when Functional Currency = Parent's Presentation Currency.
Subsidiaries whose operations are well integrated with the parent (i.e. parent makes operating, financing, and investing decisions) will use the parent’s currency as the functional currency. In this case, the British pound is both the functional and the reporting currency. Since Heltzel is translating from the local to the functional currency, remeasurement under the temporal method is appropriate. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.c)
As Heltzel is translating the balance sheet and income statement, which of the following are closest to the values Heltzel determines for revenues and accounts payable for 2008?
Since the British pound is the functional currency, the temporal method should be used. Under both the current rate and temporal methods, revenues are translated at the average rate. The value Heltzel will calculate for revenues is $75,000 / $1.70 = £44,118. Also, under both the temporal and current rate methods, monetary assets and liabilities are calculated using the current exchange rate. The value Heltzel will calculate for accounts payable will be $6,000 / $1.80 = £3,333. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.d)
Suppose that 2008 income before remeasurement gain/loss is £4,138. Dividends paid during the year are £2,250, and beginning retained earnings are £5,150. Assume for purposes of this question only the ending retained earnings are 7,323. The remeasurement gain/loss for 2008 will be closest to:
Net income = ending retained earnings − beginning retained earnings + dividends paid.
Net income = 7323 − 5150 + 2250 = £4423.
Remeasurement gain = net income − net income before remeasurement gain = 4423 − 4138 = £285.
(Study Session 6, LOS 23.d)
After remeasurement, what will be the impact on Wilson’s quick ratio and accounts receivable turnover ratios respectively for 2008?
| Quick Ratio | Accounts Receivable Turnover |
The quick ratio takes (cash + accounts receivable) / (current liabilities). Since all of these items are monetary assets and liabilities, they are all remeasured at the current exchange rate, resulting in no change to the ratio. The accounts receivable turnover ratio is calculated as (sales / accounts receivable). Note that the local currency (the U.S. dollar) is depreciating (it takes more $ to buy a pound). Since sales is remeasured at the average rate and accounts receivable is remeasured at the current rate, the depreciating currency means that the remeasured denominator will be smaller than the remeasured numerator, resulting in a larger ratio. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.d)
Heltzel decides to redefine the functional currency to assess how the current rate vs. the temporal method will impact Wilson’s financial statements. Wilson’s gross profit margin will be lower under the: A)
| current rate method, and the total asset turnover ratio will be higher under the current rate method. |
| B)
| current rate method, and the total asset turnover ratio will be higher under the temporal method. |
| C)
| temporal method, and the total asset turnover ratio will be higher under the current rate method. |
|
Wilson’s gross profit margin (gross profit / sales) will be lower under the temporal method. Sales under both methods are converted at the average rate, while COGS is converted at the historical rate under the temporal method (note FIFO inventory accounting). Since the local currency (the U.S. dollar) is depreciating, COGS will be higher under temporal method, resulting in a lower gross profit and a lower gross profit margin.
Wilson’s total asset turnover ratio (sales / total assets) will be higher under the current rate method. Non-monetary assets are converted at the historical rate using the temporal method and the current rate under the current rate method. The depreciating local currency means that total assets will be lower under the current rate method. The lower denominator will lead to a higher total asset turnover ratio under the current rate method. (Study Session 6, LOS 23.d) |
|