Don't laugh....how about pursuing CIPM?

Rank: 2

UID: 222292
帖子: 399
主题: 8
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2014-6-29

2^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

its a performance/attribution designation

mar350

UID: 222322
帖子: 461
主题: 17
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2015-7-31

3^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

SuperiorReturn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> its a performance/attribution designation

yes, it is performance measurement designation; which can be invaluable in manager selection process.

IAmNeil

UID: 222300
帖子: 619
主题: 52
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2015-12-20

4^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

Ashwin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SuperiorReturn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > its a performance/attribution designation
>
> yes, it is performance measurement designation;
> which can be invaluable in manager selection
> process.

If its invaluable, why dont you do it?
Collect them all!

ohai

Rank: 2

UID: 222303
帖子: 400
主题: 8
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2015-11-28

5^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

:*

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 09:22AM by tkchunc.

liangfeng

UID: 218211
帖子: 659
主题: 120
注册时间: 2011-5-26
最后登录: 2012-9-12

6^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

If you are serious about equity analysis, I wouldn't even bother

pennyless

Rank: 2

UID: 222326
帖子: 285
主题: 15
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2015-1-30

7^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

I had the same idea Ashwin. u can complete it in one year, and when i saw the LOS of the 2 CIPM levels, it looked as an logical extension for the last 3 S.S of Level 3. Iam considering taking it after finishing Level 3. Hope to Pass

)

thommo77

UID: 222320
帖子: 448
主题: 21
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2015-12-8

8^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

The 1st level of the CIPM is nothing but a rehash of the performance material from L3 (only easier)....

The second half seems to go a little further into performance attribution and evaluation.

I am currently a performance analyst, and there's no way in hell I would take the CIPM out of fear of getting labeled as a "performance guy" forever...

Also, McLeod81, CFA, CIPM just doesn't look right. I think it would take too much focus away from the more important letters.

lcw77

UID: 218209
帖子: 537
主题: 136
注册时间: 2011-5-26
最后登录: 2012-9-12

9^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:13 | 只看该作者

CIPM is pretty much useless in the manager analysis field. For top Fund of Fund shops a CFA and top MBA is pretty much a staple.

Performance measurement isn't a horrible field and you can make decent coin if the CFA ever decide to make mandatory verification by 3rd party firms. But all the top performance guys have both CFA and CIPM so having the CIPM alone will make you look bad imo.

Colum

Rank: 2

UID: 222311
帖子: 394
主题: 19
注册时间: 2011-7-2
最后登录: 2016-8-1

10^#

发表于 2011-7-13 16:14 | 只看该作者

Why is CFP in the conversation? If you want to be Asset Management CFA is the best. If you want to do FoFs/ Pension Funds CFA is still the best, but the CAIA is gaining traction, and pretty much becoming a staple. End of discussion.