Christopher Lance, CFA, Chuck Cunningham, and Lucy Hunt, CFA, went to graduate school together and have remained close friends ever since. Lance and Hunt earned their CFA charters this past June and Cunningham is a Level III candidate. Lance, Cunningham, and Hunt have dinner every month at Cunninghams country club, one of the most prestigious in the metropolitan area where they live. Lance was a well-respected research analyst covering the pharmaceutical industry at an international broker-dealer before accepting a job as Vice President, Investor Relations, at IMed, a large multinational pharmaceutical company that he covered as an analyst. Since he started coverage of IMed, Lance had consistently been named top analyst of the pharmaceutical industry by Investment Professional, the leading journal of the investment industry. In his new position at IMed, Lance is the principal spokesperson on the companys financial performance and is responsible for developing and maintaining good relationships with the companys shareholders, especially large institutional investors, and with approximately 30 research analysts who issue research reports and make recommendations about publicly-traded equity and debt securities. It is April 12th and Lance is preparing to conduct the next conference call following the release on April 15th of IMeds quarterly earnings. Participating in the call will be Lances former colleague and good friend, Cunningham, and the other analysts who cover IMed. In addition, Hunt, a portfolio manager at Primary Pensions, a major institutional investor, has told Lance she will also be on the call. Primary Pensions has accumulated the largest single holding in IMed equity. Lance is concerned about this call because IMeds president, Bill Norton, has just told the management team that sales of Mediplex, its new cancer drug, have begun to sag after rumors of serious side effects, including death, have hit the press. Norton told Lance that if sales continue to fall that this years earnings would be considerably less than the current consensus forecast. Norton is also concerned that the regulatory agency that approves the sale of drugs will repeal IMeds license to market Mediplex. Cunningham is a research analyst at Lances former employer and has taken over coverage of IMed following Lances resignation. Until his promotion to Lances former position, Cunningham was a junior analyst covering the oil and gas industry. Although knowledgeable about fundamental financial analysis and equity valuation, he is unfamiliar with IMed and the pharmaceutical industry. Cunningham has been reviewing the past 5 years of IMeds financial statements and Lances research reports in preparation for participating in IMeds quarterly conference call to discuss its quarterly earnings release. Cunningham is under considerable pressure from his employer to meet or exceed Lances reputation and be rated top analyst by Investment Professional. His firms currently rates IMed as a strong buy based on Lances last research report. Based on his own preliminary analysis, Cunningham has a hard time justifying a hold recommendation. He is puzzled by several of the earnings adjustments that Lance made to achieve his target share price for IMed. He plans to ask Lance about these adjustments at their dinner on April 14th. Hunt has been managing a large cap equity portfolio at Primary Pensions for 5 years. Based almost exclusively on Lances buy recommendations in his research report, she began purchasing IMed several years ago just before it made several major acquisitions that contributed to its phenomenal growth and to her portfolios performance over the last 5 years. Since Lance moved to IMed, Hunt has been doing some due diligence and has become concerned that the growth of IMeds earnings is overly dependent on sales of Mediplex. Based on her enthusiasm for IMed and her portfolios performance, other managers at Primary Pensions have also taken considerable positions in IMed to the extent that Primary Pensions is IMeds largest single stockholder. If she is right, Hunt knows that she will need to reduce her portfolios holdings. Since Primary Pensions prohibits its employees from owning individual equity securities, Hunt has no personal investment in IMed. However, she had boasted about IMeds performance to her mother and is aware that her mothers investment club invested 10 percent of the clubs assets in IMed. Hunt is preparing her questions for the upcoming conference call and her exit strategy if the answers confirm her fears. Lance, Cunningham, and Hunt met for their regular monthly dinner on April 14th. Cunningham opens the after dinner discussion by questioning Lance about his new job and asks him if he and Hunt should anticipate any surprises at tomorrows conference call. Cunningham specifically asks Lance if IMed will meet or beat analyst expectations and the consensus earnings forecast. Lance responds that, under current securities laws, he is unable to discuss details of IMeds performance with Cunningham and Hunt and that theyll both be briefed with the other analysts and shareholders on tomorrows call. Shortly thereafter, the three friends say their good-byes. Hunt and Cunningham wish Lance well on the next days conference call. What Standard governs Lances response to Cunninghams question and is he in compliance? A) | VII: Responsibilities as a CFA Institute Member or CFA Candidate | Yes |
|
| | C) | V: Investment Analysis, Recommendations, and Action | No |
|
| |
Answer and Explanation
Lances response to Cunninghams question is covered under Standard I(A) which requires members to maintain knowledge of and comply with applicable laws and regulations (including the CFA Institutes Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct). In this case, Lance specifically references the requirements of securities laws not to discuss IMeds performance in advance of the quarterly conference call. If he had done so, he would have disclosed material nonpublic information, since he knows that information about the decline in sales of Mediplex will have an adverse affect on IMeds share price. In addition, Standard I(A) prohibits Lance from knowingly participating or assisting in any violation of such laws. If Lance had responded in any other way to Cunninghams question he would potentially have assisted Cunningham and Hunt in violating Standard II(A), Material Nonpublic Information. |