上一主题:Fully integrated vs fully segmented economy
下一主题:Ethics questions
返回列表 发帖
Can someone explain why you have $100M in denominator, and not $125M? This is question 14 on page 151in CFAI.

" if we use funds from a $25 million overnight repo agreement to purchase bonds in addition to the current $100 million portfolio, the levered portfolio’s change in value for a 1% change in interest rates would equal $5,125,000 while giving you the portfolio duration you require."

Since the 100 MM represents the equity in your portfolio...

TOP

The question asks for the duration of the portfolio, so the denominator is 100m.

This is a typical CFAI question, it actually gives you the leveraged portfolio's change in value for 1% rate change, and the amount of equity.

It seems tht it assumes the duration of liabilities (repo agreement) is 0. Please confirm...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Sunday, May 8, 2011 at 04:42PM by deriv108.

TOP

If repo is overnight the duration = 0
if 2-year repo, the duration is = 2

TOP

Thanks!

Since the question asks "duration of the portfolio", shouldn't it be $125M since the portfolio is now $125M including the leverage of $25M? The question asks Duration of total portfolio, not just the equity portion of the portfolio. Also, is it really true that if the repo is 2-year then the Duration is 2?

I read every word on this topic in CFAI curriculum but still haven't found satisfactory explanation.

TOP

No one else have problem with EOC Q14 on P151?

TOP

deriv, do you have a job? I always see you on here.

TOP

bpdulog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> deriv108 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You should widen your confidence interval...
> >
>
> Is that your pickup line??

bpdulog, you're not wake2000...

"Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible".

TOP

Ashwin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Deriv108, the explanation by Jbaphna makes sense.
> If the duration of overnight portfolio is zero,
> then adding $25M to the denominator is not
> necessary. At least that is how I am going to try
> to remember this just in case if this kind of
> question shows up in the exam


Yes it is, because you have to prove to the grader you know $25 million times 0 is 0.

NO EXCUSES

TOP

I have to give up on this one. This could have been discussed in an earlier time -- now it's not a good time. Thank for raising this question,..., I did read those pages quite a few times. No need to review it till the day after 6/4.

Don't Fight CFAI.

TOP

返回列表
上一主题:Fully integrated vs fully segmented economy
下一主题:Ethics questions