- UID
- 223340
- 帖子
- 314
- 主题
- 57
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-11-2
|
35#
发表于 2012-3-26 17:16
| 只看该作者
An analyst is interested in forecasting the rate of employment growth and instability for 254 metropolitan areas around the United States. The analyst’s main purpose for these forecasts is to estimate the demand for commercial real estate in each metro area. The independent variables in the analysis represent the percentage of employment in each industry group.
Regression of Employment Growth Rates and Employment Instability
on Industry Mix Variables for 254 U.S. Metro Areas |
|
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Dependent Variable | Employment Growth Rate | Relative Employment Instability |
Independent Variables | Coefficient Estimate | t-value | Coefficient Estimate | t-value |
Intercept |
–2.3913 |
–0.713 |
3.4626 |
0.623 |
% Construction Employment |
0.2219 |
4.491 |
0.1715 |
2.096 |
% Manufacturing Employment |
0.0136 |
0.393 |
0.0037 |
0.064 |
% Wholesale Trade Employment |
–0.0092 |
–0.171 |
0.0244 |
0.275 |
% Retail Trade Employment |
–0.0012 |
–0.031 |
–0.0365 |
–0.578 |
% Financial Services Employment |
0.0605 |
1.271 |
–0.0344 |
–0.437 |
% Other Services Employment |
0.1037 |
2.792 |
0.0208 |
0.338 |
|
|
|
|
|
R² |
0.289 |
|
0.047 |
|
Adjusted R² |
0.272 |
|
0.024 |
|
F-Statistic |
16.791 |
|
2.040 |
|
Standard error of estimate |
0.546 |
|
0.345 |
| Based on the data given, which independent variables have both a statistically and an economically significant impact (at the 5% level) on metropolitan employment growth rates? A)
| "% Manufacturing Employment," "% Financial Services Employment," "% Wholesale Trade Employment," and "% Retail Trade" only. |
| B)
| "% Construction Employment" and "% Other Services Employment" only. |
| C)
| "% Wholesale Trade Employment" and "% Retail Trade" only. |
|
The percentage of construction employment and the percentage of other services employment have a statistically significant impact on employment growth rates in U.S. metro areas. The t-statistics are 4.491 and 2.792, respectively, and the critical t is 1.96 (95% confidence and 247 degrees of freedom). In terms of economic significance, construction and other services appear to be significant. In other words, as construction employment rises 1%, the employment growth rate rises 0.2219%. The coefficients of all other variables are too close to zero to ascertain any economic significance, and their t-statistics are too low to conclude that they are statistically significant. Therefore, there are only two independent variables that are both statistically and economically significant: "% of construction employment" and "% of other services employment".
Some may argue, however, that financial services employment is also economically significant even though it is not statistically significant because of the magnitude of the coefficient. Economic significance can occur without statistical significance if there are statistical problems. For instance, the multicollinearity makes it harder to say that a variable is statistically significant. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.m)
The coefficient standard error for the independent variable “% Construction Employment” under the relative employment instability model is closest to:
The t-statistic is computed by t-statistic = slope coefficient / coefficient standard error. Therefore, the coefficient standard error =
= slope coefficient/the t-statistic = 0.1715/2.096 = 0.0818. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.a)
Which of the following best describes how to interpret the R2 for the employment growth rate model? Changes in the value of the: A)
| independent variables cause 28.9% of the variability of the employment growth rate. |
| B)
| independent variables explain 28.9% of the variability of the employment growth rate. |
| C)
| employment growth rate explain 28.9% of the variability of the independent variables. |
|
The R2 indicates the percent variability of the dependent variable that is explained by the variability of the independent variables. In the employment growth rate model, the variability of the independent variables explains 28.9% of the variability of employment growth. Regression analysis does not establish a causal relationship. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.f)
Using the following forecasts for Cedar Rapids, Iowa, the forecasted employment growth rate for that city is closest to:Construction employment | 10% | Manufacturing | 30% | Wholesale trade | 5% | Retail trade | 20% | Financial services | 15% | Other services | 20% |
The forecast uses the intercept and coefficient estimates for the model. The forecast is:
= −2.3913 + (0.2219)(10) + (0.0136)(30) + (−0.0092)(5) + (−0.0012)(20) + (0.0605)(15) + (0.1037)(20) = 3.15%. (Study Session 3, LOS 12.c)
The 95% confidence interval for the coefficient estimate for “% Construction Employment” from the relative employment instability model is closest to:
With a sample size of 254, and 254 − 6 − 1 = 247 degrees of freedom, the critical value for a two-tail 95% t-statistic is very close to the two-tail 95% statistic of 1.96. Using this critical value, the formula for the 95% confidence interval for the jth coefficient estimate is:95% confidence interval = . But first we need to figure out the coefficient standard error:
Hence, the confidence interval is 0.1715 ± 1.96(0.08182).
With 95% probability, the coefficient will range from 0.0111 to 0.3319, 95% CI = {0.0111 < b1 < 0.3319}. (Study Session 3, LOS 11.f)
One possible problem that could jeopardize the validity of the employment growth rate model is multicollinearity. Which of the following would suggest the existence of multicollinearity? A)
| The variance of the observations has increased over time. |
| B)
| There is high positive correlation between “% Manufacturing Employment,” “% Service Sector Employment,” and “% Construction Employment.” |
| C)
| The employment growth rate displays a steady upward trend during the period covered by the data. |
|
The problem of multicollinearity involves the existence of high correlation between two or more independent variables. Clearly, as service employment rises, construction employment must rise to facilitate the growth in these sectors. Alternatively, as manufacturing employment rises, the service sector must grow to serve the broader manufacturing sector.- The variance of observations suggests the possible existence of heteroskedasticity.
- A steady upward trend displayed by the employment growth rate suggests the possible existence of autocorrelation.
(Study Session 3, LOS 12.j) |
|