- UID
- 222300
- 帖子
- 619
- 主题
- 52
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-2
- 最后登录
- 2015-12-20
|
3#
发表于 2011-10-8 02:57
| 只看该作者
I think the first step to look at these funds is whether the strategy is alternative beta or an alpha strategy?
If it's alternative beta (a commodities index fund for a simple example), can the mutual fund '40 act structure truly access the asset class? For instance, a lot of research is pointing to market neutral funds being more alternative beta than manager alpha, can a '40 act fund provide true exposure to that beta? In some strategies/asset classes the answer is yes, in some no.
On HF replication, there hasn't been any great emperical evidence that replication works. I personally believe that a lot of HF performance is alternative beta/segmented markets where a passive approach makes sense, but we're still not there on the product side.
If it's a alpha strategy, why is this manager working in a mutual fund environment? It's easy math, if he is successful, he'll make more money in the HF world.
This is an overly simplistic analysis, but I prefer most of my alternatives to truly be alternatives. |
|